Escuchar "#16: Congreso Mundial de Neurorrehabilitación 2020: N.Ward, K.Hayward, F.Hummel|Hemispherics"
Síntesis del Episodio
En el episodio de hoy vamos a comentar el Congreso Mundial de Neurorrehabilitación 2020 #WCNR2020 que se realizó online durante los días 6 al 11 de octubre del 2020, coincidiendo con el 25º Congreso de la SOFMER. Como suele ser habitual, el congreso tuvo diferentes áreas o temas de estudio, como por ejemplo: robótica, neuroortopedia, esclerosis múltiple, rehabilitación sensorial, diseño de estudios, espasticidad, neuropediatría, ejercicio, neuroplasticidad, estimulación cerebral, desórdenes de conciencia…etc. Sin embargo, he decidido resaltar 8 ponencias que me parecieron especialmente interesantes y las repartiré en 3 episodios.
Artículos Ponencia Nick Ward:
(1) Meyer (2015). Functional and motor outcome 5 years after stroke is equivalent to outcome at 2 months: follow-up of the collaborative evaluation of rehabilitation in stroke across Europe (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25953370/).
(2) Wieloch (2006). Mechanisms of neural plasticity following brain injury (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16713245/).
(3) Ward (2020). Blowing up Neural Repair for Stroke Recovery: Preclinical and Clinical Trial Considerations (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32951539/).
(4) Van Kordelaar (2014). Impact of time on quality of motor control of the paretic upper limb after stroke (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24161273/)
Artículos ponencia Kathryn Hayward:
(1) Bernhardt (2019). A Stroke Recovery Trial Development Framework: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Second Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31674274/).
(2) Boyd (2017). Biomarkers of stroke recovery: Consensus-based core
recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation
Roundtable (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6791523/pdf/nihms-1006724.pdf).
(3) BiGTeD: http://bigted.org/
Artículos ponencia de Friedhelm Hummel:
(1) Guggisberg (2019). Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31082786/).
(2) Schultz (2017). Interactions Between the Corticospinal Tract and Premotor-Motor Pathways for Residual Motor Output After Stroke (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28904231/).
Artículos Ponencia Nick Ward:
(1) Meyer (2015). Functional and motor outcome 5 years after stroke is equivalent to outcome at 2 months: follow-up of the collaborative evaluation of rehabilitation in stroke across Europe (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25953370/).
(2) Wieloch (2006). Mechanisms of neural plasticity following brain injury (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16713245/).
(3) Ward (2020). Blowing up Neural Repair for Stroke Recovery: Preclinical and Clinical Trial Considerations (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32951539/).
(4) Van Kordelaar (2014). Impact of time on quality of motor control of the paretic upper limb after stroke (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24161273/)
Artículos ponencia Kathryn Hayward:
(1) Bernhardt (2019). A Stroke Recovery Trial Development Framework: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Second Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31674274/).
(2) Boyd (2017). Biomarkers of stroke recovery: Consensus-based core
recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation
Roundtable (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6791523/pdf/nihms-1006724.pdf).
(3) BiGTeD: http://bigted.org/
Artículos ponencia de Friedhelm Hummel:
(1) Guggisberg (2019). Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31082786/).
(2) Schultz (2017). Interactions Between the Corticospinal Tract and Premotor-Motor Pathways for Residual Motor Output After Stroke (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28904231/).
Más episodios del podcast Hemispherics
#80: El tracto corticoespinal: All in
24/05/2025
#76: Aprendiendo Neurología con el MIR
07/02/2025